Prove Your Browser Security Controls Are Working
Auditors ask "how do you know your security policies are effective?" The W3C Reporting API turns browsers into compliance sensors — generating timestamped, audit-ready evidence that your controls are actively working, not just documented.
The Situation
Compliance Requires Continuous Evidence of Control Effectiveness
Modern compliance frameworks have moved beyond point-in-time audits. GDPR Article 32 demands "regularly testing, assessing and evaluating effectiveness" of technical measures. SOC 2 Type II evaluates control effectiveness over 3-12 months of continuous operation. NIS2 requires 24-hour incident early warning notifications.
The shift to continuous compliance is accelerating. Research shows 91% of companies plan to implement continuous compliance within the next five years. Enterprises now juggle an average of 7 overlapping regulatory frameworks—each requiring documented evidence that security controls are operating effectively.
Point-in-time compliance snapshots no longer satisfy auditors. They want to see evidence that your controls worked consistently throughout the audit period — not just on the day they visited.
The Complication
Browser Security Events Happen Outside Your Audit Trail
Browser security events happen in an environment your server logs never see. When your CSP blocks an XSS attempt, there's no audit trail. When your Permissions Policy prevents a third-party script from accessing the camera, there's no evidence for auditors. When SRI catches a tampered CDN resource, you have no documentation of the control in action.
Traditional monitoring tools—APM, WAFs, SIEMs — see server-side traffic but are blind to what happens in the browser. Research shows the average website contains 60+ third-party tags accessing sensitive data, and over half collect data they shouldn't.
You've implemented the policies. But when auditors ask "how do you know they're working?"—you have nothing to show. The compliance gap isn't in your controls. It's in your evidence.
The Solution
Turn Browser Security Policies into Compliance Documentation
The W3C Reporting API transforms your browser security policies into compliance sensors. When your CSP blocks unauthorized scripts, the browser generates a structured violation report. When your Permissions Policy denies camera access to a third-party script, the browser documents the attempt. Every enforcement action creates timestamped, browser-generated evidence.
This evidence is tamper-resistant—generated by the browser itself, not your application code. It's continuous—capturing every violation throughout your audit period. And it's standardized—the W3C specification ensures consistent report formats across all browsers.
We capture these reports and route them to your existing tools—SIEM, log aggregators, or webhook endpoints. Your compliance evidence lives alongside your other audit data, in the systems your auditors already trust.
Framework Coverage
Evidence for the Frameworks That Matter
Browser security reports support compliance across multiple regulatory frameworks.
-
GDPR Articles 25, 32
- Demonstrate privacy-by-design with browser-enforced controls. Permissions Policy violations prove data minimization is actively enforced, not just documented. Generate evidence for Article 32's requirement to "regularly test effectiveness" of technical measures.
-
SOC 2 Type II
- Support CC7.2/CC7.3/CC7.4 (security event monitoring, incident detection, response) with continuous browser event logging. Demonstrate control effectiveness throughout your 3-12 month audit period — not just on assessment day.
-
ISO 27001:2022
- Address A.8.15/A.8.16 (logging and monitoring) with client-side security event capture. Extend your monitoring coverage to the browser environment that traditional tools can't see.
-
NIS2 Directive
- Support Article 21 (risk management) and Article 23 (incident detection) with real-time browser security events. Enable 24-hour early warning notifications with immediate violation alerting.
Third-Party Governance
See What Third-Party Scripts Are Doing — And Prove You're Monitoring Them
Third-party scripts execute with your application's privileges. Analytics vendors, ad networks, chatbots — they all have full DOM access. GDPR Article 28 requires documented processor oversight. CCPA requires disclosure of third-party data collection. SOC 2 CC9.2 demands third-party risk management evidence.
Permissions Policy violation reports document every instance where a third-party script attempts unauthorized API access: camera, microphone, geolocation, payment APIs. You gain auditable evidence of which vendors attempted what access — and proof that your policies blocked it.
When vendors breach their data boundaries, you have documentation for contract enforcement. When auditors ask about third-party oversight, you have timestamped records of your controls in action.
Compliance Evidence
Report Types That Generate Audit Trails
Each browser security report type creates specific compliance evidence.
-
CSP Violations
- Document security event monitoring for SOC 2 CC7.2. Every blocked script creates timestamped evidence of control effectiveness. Learn more
-
Permissions Policy
- Create privacy audit trails for GDPR Article 25. Prove data minimization with records of blocked API access attempts. Learn more
-
Integrity (SRI)
- Support supply chain governance for SOC 2 CC9.2. Detect and document when third-party resources fail integrity verification. Learn more
-
Cross-Origin Isolation
- Monitor isolation policy enforcement. Document COOP/ COEP violations for security boundary evidence. Learn more
The Cost of Non-Compliance
Compliance Investment vs. Breach Consequences
Research consistently shows that non-compliance costs 3x more than compliance — approximately $15 million annually versus $5.5 million for maintaining compliant operations. The math is clear: investing in compliance infrastructure pays for itself.
Regulatory penalties continue to escalate. GDPR fines can reach 4% of global revenue or €20 million. NIS2 introduces penalties up to €10 million or 2% of global turnover. PCI DSS non-compliance can cost $5,000-$500,000 per incident, plus card brand fines.
Beyond direct penalties, compliance failures erode customer trust and invite regulatory scrutiny. Organizations with documented, continuous compliance evidence face shorter audits, fewer findings, and stronger relationships with regulators.
Start Building Your Compliance Evidence Today
Generate audit-ready browser security evidence in minutes. Route violations to your existing tools — no new dashboards to learn.